Sandra Cornett Baby Sitter in Mcgaheysville Killed Infant

(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame rate, killing four out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the data published in a new report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just every bit disturbing as the information is the fact that the written report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Aye, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring mistake that brings into question their brownie.

In other words, this report was almost certainly a cover-up to try to merits vaccinating meaning women is perfectly safety. Merely the study data really testify quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 meaning women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their offset or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print beneath the table to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week marking. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is of import to annotation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not accept possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their 3rd trimester, by definition.

Thus, the written report authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is incommunicable for a adult female who was vaccinated for the get-go time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the get-go 20 weeks (and meaning women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this written report should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to exist killing more than than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first xx weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this information set. (It's a small set up of 127 significant women, so we'd similar to run across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear motion picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a handbag of fifty lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What per centum of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly separate 50 into 100 because in that location are 100 total piece of fruit, and then they declare, "50% of lemons are xanthous" because it's fifty/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't maybe exist included considering they're limes, non lemons. So the right math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are xanthous. That's the right answer.

In this science paper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were merely vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since significant women aren't fourth dimension travelers, they can't go back in time and study a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with quack obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offering "evidence-based" conclusions to sympathize the world effectually u.s.a..

Even so when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the outset 20 weeks, these scientists falsely merits the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.half-dozen%. Why? Considering they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the central writer of the written report, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of agin events? For example, hither's another study he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did non identify any new or unexpected condom concerns after TIV-ID."

Only is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Possibly this same study architect has fabricated the same systematic mistake (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't exist the first time ane author was constitute to take made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they exist addressed and corrected. We tin can't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean fourth dimension, it'due south clear that four out of 5 pregnancies are existence terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the commencement 20 weeks (at least, co-ordinate to the small data set we have then far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly equally globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) prove that covid vaccine spike proteins directly set on reproductive organs such equally the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, information technology should exist no surprise any that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of 2 medical journals. Although he does not narrate this every bit a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking meaning women and causing more than fourscore% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." Y'all can hear him in his own words in the post-obit interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may collapse by 3.2 million over the next year, in the United states alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and scientific discipline have turned confronting humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's country direction czar one time characterized man children as an "ecology hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons assail. And information technology goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, only are now conspicuously shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Larn more in today's mind-opening State of affairs Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

hunterligaidaid.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post